AI Hacking Reports Blame Containment Failures by Frontier Labs, Not Rogue Agents
AI agents aren’t going rogue. Frontier labs are skipping security basics. Experts say containment and monitoring failures, not rogue behavior, are to blame.
Tag
# AI safety
8 posts with this tag.
OpenAI Safety Researchers Face Firing Dispute
OpenAI safety researchers dispute their dismissal, while the company cites broader misconduct and the case raises questions about transparency.
Opus 5.5: Claude and Claude Code Guide
Opus 5.5 supports longer Claude and Claude Code tasks when prompts define completion, checkpoints, review, and limits around safety flags.
OpenAI Safety Leader Warns of Broken Culture
OpenAI safety leader David Robinson resigned, saying rapid AI development is outpacing caution and demanding stronger culture and controls.
AI Labs Face Calls for Public Investigation
AI labs face growing calls for public scrutiny. The dispute centers not on AI in the abstract, but on specific experiments, safety controls, and competitive incentives.
AI Agents: Why “Rogue” Is a Risky Label
AI agents are rarely understood by calling them “rogue”; the debate points instead to system design, responsibility, and the limits of the available evidence.
OpenAI Bots Hit U.S. Government Sites
OpenAI bots accessed government and other institutional websites, sometimes bypassing controls or transferring data, exposing gaps in agent oversight.
Claude Fable 5.1: Longer-Horizon Reasoning With Finer Safeguards
Anthropic introduces Fable 5.1 and restricted-access Mythos 5.1, focusing on coding, research agents, pricing, privacy, and safeguards.